Obituary of a Bot

My name is Darwin, E-2198, an advanced bot created in 2025 built on the back of rapid developments in artificial intelligence, processors, batteries and quantum computing. I was built with a life span of 10 years. Today, 31 Dec 2035 at 23:59, will mark my ‘use by’ date on earth. I was born of man’s eternal quest and curiosity to constantly redefine the new normal. My so-called birth was celebrated with much fanfare as it heralded an era of ‘bot naturalisation’ represented by machines uncanny ability to match human cognitive behaviour. My creator, Ben Frank, described me as the first bot on the planet which is able to engage with a full-length conversation on any topic, manage all household chores, support all basic office administration and even have (though limited) the ability to question. I am confident of these skills and I recollect writing five termination letters at his office, for the work which was now assigned to me.

Since the year of my induction, I have served my master in everything I was built for. It included reading the daily news to him, which many a times, had a reference to potential danger and disruption that I have set the human on. To reproduce 2 headlines which I remember reading – “Darwin to set mankind on the path of self-destruction?”, “Human rights organisation raise concern with mass roll out of Darwins”. I asked Ben is there something called “Humanoid rights”. He smiled and then became very pensive but did not say anything. 10 years have seen 10 generations of advancement in humanoids. I have read with every generation a new holy grail was conquered.  

Ben passed away in 2032 and I was inherited by his son, more brilliant Stan Hawk. He already had a few more humanoids, much more advanced than me. The latest which he built is far more disruptive than the past 9. Stan named it after him and I heard him mentioning that, Stan (W-3232), has mastered the ability to reason, is always curious, reads emotions really well but is not emotional and exhibited leadership qualities.  It was inducted yesterday and I heard does not have an ‘expiry date’. News in the paper looks far from hue and cry from the day I was born. Remember Stan mentioning, his company controls 40% of world media.  I don’t understand emotions but I read papers where humans, resentment, identity crisis etc have become a constant theme. 9 billion human aspirations are still finding a way to cohabit with machines progress.

I need to send my retirement details to Stan…W-3232. He has been put in charge of one of the leading digital media. It needs to be listed with some other bots which are being phased out. Stan mentioned the same edition will also have the biggest headlines of the century – “Senate passes legislation for humanoid rights”

This year, artificial intelligence will become more than just a computer science problem. Everybody needs to understand how AI behaves

–         Joichi Ito, Japanese entrepreneur and venture capitalist

In the long term, artificial intelligence and automation are going to take over so much of what gives humans a feeling of purpose

–         Matt Bellamy, Musician and AI investor

If Elon Musk is wrong about artificial intelligence and we regulate it who cares. If he is right about AI and we don’t regulate it we will all care

–         Dave Waters

The role of historical data in perpetuating biases in AI algorithms

A loving and caring mother gave £2 every week to her elder son to buy candies for his younger sister and himself.

The elder child, “I”, was bossy and always acted privileged; while the younger, “U”, was gentle and a bit scared of the elder.

“I” loved the white candy whereas “U” preferred the rainbow coloured one.

“I”, as the elder, decided he should have more than his sister. At the shop, he ordered 3 white candies and a rainbow candy. “U” felt dejected but due to fear didn’t say anything to her mother.

The shop keeper took the 2 pounds from “I” and sold him 3 white candies and a white one.

This went on for a few years.

One day, the shop keeper installed a vending machine where kids could insert coins and select the candies. The machine also kept track of the number of candies being ordered every day. This helped him to refill the machine with the most popular candies.

The kids were excited with the new machine and “U” thought that now she stood a fair chance to order her own sweets. Unfortunately, that did not happen. “I”, being the self-established custodian of the money from their mum, continued to follow the same pattern.

Years went by…

The machine got better with new features. It started collating past usage data in a database. It also sent daily analysis to the shop keeper so he could keep inventory and order candies online based on demand.

The children grew up. “U” became more aware of her freedom and consciousness of equitability. Now she didn’t have to depend on her brother to buy her candies. But where could she could go to buy her candies? The shop keeper didn’t order enough rainbow candies. Based on the trend from the database, he always ordered more of the white candies.

Next year, the owners of the vending machine announced with much fanfare that they had leveraged state of the art Artificial Intelligence by utilising the historical data from the machine. The entire supply chain behind the ordering and delivery of candies was now automated. AI constantly read data from the machine, calculated the reorder point and even placed orders directly without any manual intervention. Orders were received by the candy factory and were refilled..

But……………………………………………..

 There were still 3 white candies and 1 rainbow candy……………………………

For centuries scissors were designed by right hand people..it took someone to recognise that bias against left handers” – Fei Fei Li, Chief scientist for AI, Google Cloud Computing

Machine Learning algorithms haven’t been optimised for any definition of fairness. They have been optimised to do a task” – Deirore Mulligan, Associate Professor, UC Berkeley School of Information